Gainsborough Old Hall was built in 1460…therefore it HAS to be Tudor….!

Well, if Richard III was entertained there, Gainsborough Old Hall can’t have always been Tudor! This article even says as much in a heading: “….Lincolnshire house, built in 1460, has been a theatre, preaching house, pub and masonic temple….” Excuse me, but 1460 was Plantagenet, not Tudor. Maybe it’s a Guardian error. (Perish the thought.)

The article then goes on to say:

….The hall was built in 1460 for Sir Thomas Burgh, a political climber and survivor who wanted a spectacular family home that would reflect his status.

“….All that he created is more or less still there, a Tudor relic almost hiding in plain sight in the middle of the Lincolnshire market town….”

So, a Tudor relic from 1460. Check your dates, Guardian.

The fact is that anything half-timbered is labelled Tudor, when in fact such buildings and styles had been around for a long time before HVII’s family left the homestead in Anglesey to mix with the nobs and become a plague upon England. Henry VII must have at least one fan, I suppose, but I’ll bet that fan likes to refer to him as Renaissance. Oh no. Henry was medieval, pure and simple. Well, maybe not pure…. And the Renaissance is welcome to Henry VIII, et al.

Why can’t Tudorists accept that most things accorded to the Tudors actually began under the Plantagenets. Night didn’t suddenly descend at Bosworth on 22nd August 1485, and a glorious new dawn commence, with a dazzling shaft of sunlight beaming down frm the heavens to illuminate cherubic Henry Tudor. Richard III was fast becoming a Renaissance monarch when he was sliced down that awful day at Bosworth, murdered by Tudor’s henchmen in an act of treachery that left even Henry Tudor himself jittery ever afterward. If they could do it once, well, they could do it again. Serves him right.

Anyway, I digress from beautiful Gainsborough Old Hall, which has returned to the English Heritage fold and will reopen on Saturday, 3rd July. This magnificent 15th-century house is well worth a visit.

3 comments

  1. Thank You so much for a very interesting read, funny though, I was just reading about Catherine Parr and a man named Burgh was also mentioned. I honestly didn’t even know that this beautiful and very important historical building existed. I only hope that the statue and history hating brigade don’t get anywhere near it. You know what they’re like, anything built before the year 2000 and it’s racist, the most used word ever invented, since the creation of the written word.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. You’re absolutely correct, as a newspaper article or whatever, then, they should get it right. As for myself, I’m allowed a few mistakes, I’m getting on in years and at a push, an amateur historian. Medieval history can’t be beaten, it’s just all so interesting, fascinating.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I agree! As for being allowed to make a few mistakes…I’m no spring chicken either and have to grin and bear it if I make a mistake. Not that it happens, of course. 🙄

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: