‘Our Poor Subject’ – The Story of Katherine Bassingbourne

Researching my new novel, Distant Echoes, I found out about a court case that Richard was involved with concerning a woman called Katherine Bassingbourne. She brought a complaint before Richard’s Council because she couldn’t afford a lawyer and Richard seems to have taken her side, despite it being of no benefit to him to do so. She wasn’t powerful, influential or rich – he helped her simply because he believed in justice. So, what was her story?


She was the daughter of a York dyer, Thomas Worcester, who made a ‘nuncuperative’ will on his deathbed.  A nuncuperative will is a verbal will, usually made when the person involved was too ill or weak to write a normal one and required two witnesses. Richard writes to the mayor of York, Thomas Wrangwysh, in September 1484, ordering him to adjudicate impartially on the case, which was between Katherine and a Henry Faucet. He enclosed a petition from Katherine, whom he referred to as ‘our poor subject’ setting out a ‘grievous complaint’ against Henry. He tells Wrangwish to dispense justice in accordance with ‘our laws and good conscience’.


The case was deferred for a month so two witnesses could provide statements, confirming that Katherine’s father had made this nuncuperative will in 1452 (over thirty years before). He had bequeathed his house in York to his wife, Ellyn, until her own death, when he wanted it to revert to Katherine and any heirs she might have by then. It seems that Ellyn was probably Katherine’s stepmother.


We next hear about the case in March of 1485. It seems that Katherine had not yet received the house due to her, despite the testimony of the witness statements and had again petitioned King Richard to help her. He was then amidst a personal turmoil of his own, as his wife, Anne, was dying, but he still intervened again for Katherine and appointed John Lewes, ‘sergeant at arms unto the king’s highness’, to represent Katherine at the second hearing.

Medieval merchant's house
A mediaeval merchant’s house

We find out that after her father’s death his wife, Ellyn, had married Henry Faucet. Henry had also died by now and Ellyn was trying to bequeath the property to the surviving family of Henry after her own death, thus cutting Katherine off with nothing. This was Katherine’s complaint – a breach of the terms of her father’s will.

Annoyingly, the result of this hearing was also adjourned and there is no surviving record of the final verdict. I like to think that Katherine succeeded in her suit and that she was ‘relieved and helped’ by Richard, just as we know he helped ‘many a poor man’ gain justice.


With thanks to David Johnson, who steered me to his article in The Ricardian Bulletin of June 2017, where you can read all that is known of the story summarised here.




Image credit: By Jwkuyser [CC BY-SA 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)%5D, from Wikimedia Commons



  1. Good King Richard, what an amazing man he was, yet he’s been maligned for all these centuries. I’ve spent the last 40+ years trying to tell people what a good man he was, how just and fair he was, and about all the wonderful things he did for his country (some of which still continue.) It’s mostly fallen on deaf ears of course, everyone choosing to believe the Tudor tyrant was the good one, even though everyone knows how many people he had put to death. Jo Public have always decided Richard was rotten to the core. I sometimes feel as if I’m living in a dream world, but hopefully, one day people will know the truth. Loyaulte Me Lie.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Well, having been speaking on the subject of Richard to various groups in my area, I can say I think you are wrong about the public – I have had people coming up to me and saying things like: ‘I hope you are going to say positive things about him, because I think he was maligned’ – of course I did. One lady knocked on my window in a car park (I have a magnetic sign with the NPG portrait and ‘Most famous prince of blessed memory’ on the side of my car) and said: ‘He didn’t do it, did he?’ and I think I have only had one single person say they thought he did murder his nephews. I speak to all my patients about him and anyone else who will listen. It’s the so-called ‘historians’ who still insist on the traditional view. But the tide is turning! I am positive!

    Liked by 2 people

  3. I do so hope you’re right, but I’m afraid I haven’t had the positive vibes from others that you have. I’ve always talked to anyone and everyone about Richard, and still do, whether they want to listen or not! I have had some people who’ve asked me questions, but in all this time, I think I’ve only had two people who have genuinely wanted to know more. They were both people who came into my home, and asked me who is it I’ve got all over the walls, etc. (I’ve got a small bust of Richard, and one asked me if it was of Shakespeare!) Having all the ‘stuff’ is a great conversation starter, and I’m always thrilled if people want to know more about him. I’ll never stop plugging away, and it would be wonderful if I should get more positive reactions. I’ll never give up!

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: