Agnes Lancecrona and Robert de Vere

Robert de Vere (1362-1392) Earl of Oxford, found great favour with Richard II and was elevated first to the title of Marquess of Dublin and then in October 1386 to the dukedom of Ireland. This was the very first dukedom awarded outside the immediate royal family, and was, in effect, a “fingers up” to Richard’s many critics and opponents, the great majority of whom resented what they saw as the excessive influence de Vere had over the King.

Richard was often criticised at this time for the youth and low birth of his closest advisers, but really this was a canard. As will be seen from the bare facts of the matter, de Vere was neither young (by medieval standards) nor low born; indeed his was one of the oldest earldoms in the kingdom, albeit one of the least well endowed.

In addition, de Vere was married to the King’s first cousin, Philippa de Coucy, who was the daughter of the King’s late aunt, Isabel of England. Unfortunately, de Vere, for whatever reason, was not happy with Philippa, possibly because her inheritance had never been properly secured or perhaps for more personal reasons. At any rate, he decided to annul their marriage. This was seen as a great affront by the lady’s uncles, the dukes of York and Gloucester, who quite probably had concerns for the futures of their own daughters. The Duke of Lancaster would probably have been equally offended had he been in the country.

To make matters worse, de Vere proposed to replace Philippa with the Queen’s Czech (or possibly German) waiting-woman, Agnes Lancecrona. This was clearly a love match (at least on de Vere’s side) as Agnes had no money or land and no prospect of getting any. Agnes’ social status is obscure. One chronicler described her as the daughter of a saddler, another as a washerwoman, but she appears to have been a Lady of the Bedchamber, with the responsibility for caring for Queen Anne’s jewels. It is highly unlikely that the daughter of a saddler could have risen to such eminence, while the very idea of a washerwoman doubling up as a lady-in-waiting is too absurd to contemplate. Having said that, we really do not know who her parents were. To the English of the time, even more xenophobic than their descendants, it was probably bad enough that she was a foreigner and an immigrant.

It appears that de Vere, by giving false evidence to the Pope secured a dissolution of his marriage. He certainly gained possession of Agnes, but whether with her consent is less clear. Two of his retainers were later accused of abducting her and taking her to Chester, where de Vere was residing in the summer of 1387. They may or may not have undergone a form of marriage.

De Vere was defeated by his King’s enemies at the Battle of Radcot Bridge (20 December 1387) he fled abroad and was never able to return during his life. It is not clear whether Agnes followed him, or what happened to her. She simply disappears from the record. De Vere died in a hunting accident in 1392 before Richard could recall him.

In 1389 the dissolution of the marriage was revoked. Duchess Philippa seems never to have lost her status in practice, though for a time she was sheltered by de Vere’s rather formidable mother, who took Philippa’s side against her son. She had an annuity of 300 marks a year after her husband’s death, and was granted dower in 1398. She lived on until 1411, but chose to remain single.




  1. I enjoyed this. Thank you. I have never had any time for Robert de Vere, and regard him as a first class pain in the b-m, but his story is interesting. It would be satisfying to know whether or not Agnes Lancecrona was a willing participant. I have always thought she was, but did not know about the matter of abduction or lack of proof of a wedding. And I suppose that if false evidence had brought about the dissolution of his marriage to Philippa, then there was always the danger of this becoming known and the dissolution revoked? With Philippa still alive and refusing to do anything, Robert was between a rock and a hard place. Flies on walls must have been party to a lot of fascinating things!

    It was the threat of a change of heart on the part of the Pope that always hung over Joan of Kent’s marriage to the Black Prince. She had married two men when she was little more than a child, and the Pope came down on the side of the one she really wanted, Sir Thomas Holand. But the other “husband”, John Montacute, Earl of Salisbury, was still alive when she subsequently married Edward of Woodstock, the Black Prince. The fear was that it could be proven that she had been married to Montacute all along, and thus her marriage to the prince was invalid. And so Richard II, their son, was baseborn.

    Given this, one wonders about Richard’s attitude toward de Vere’s marital goings-on. Nothing seems to have shaken the royal devotion to his beloved friend.


  2. I am currently writing this as fiction. And my take is that de Vere’s elevation to the rank of duke and the go-ahead for his divorce are a case of Richard reacting to his opponents by deliberately winding them up. Of course, this is *not* historical, it is just my theory. But when Richard is in a weak spot he tends to make “protests” by doing stuff no one can stop him doing. In some ways he reminds me of Charles I. The main difference being that his opponents did not oppose the power of the monarchy as such (unlike the 17th Century reformers) they simply wanted it used differently.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Of course “abduction” in the middle ages does not quite mean what it means now. Often it was done with the abductee’s willing agreement, even by her design. It means removed from the protection of whoever was her lawful protector. In this case, probably, the Queen. Given the political destruction of de Vere by 1389 one has to take anything said against him with a bucket of salt. But it’s true that we can never know for sure. Among the possessions of de Vere left in Chester were Bohemian saddles which would certainly have belonged to Agnes. What happened to her after that, we can only guess. Or invent.


    1. The reign of Richard II is my target at the moment as well, sighthound6. Although not, I suspect, from the same angle as you. It’s a truly fascinating period, with everything that makes things medieval so absorbing. Good luck with your book.


Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: