murreyandblue

A great WordPress.com site

CAN A PICTURE PAINT A THOUSAND WORDS?

It’s said a picture can paint a thousand words.  It certainly can but not always accurately.  It can distort the truth.  Art work based on the Ricardian period is certainly true of this.  Take for example the stunning painting by Edwin Austin Abbey, Richard Duke of Gloucester and the Lady Anne.

800px-Edwin_Austin_Abbey_richard_duke_of_gloucester_and_the_lady_anne_1896.jpgRichard Duke of Gloucester and Lady Anne, Edwin Austin Abbey, 1896.

Here we have an angst ridden Anne, while a definitely humpbacked Gloucester offers her a ring.  It just makes you want to shout at the canvas ‘run, run Anne and don’t look back..!’ although it should in fairness be remembered the painting is based on a scene from Shakespeare’s version of Richard lll rather than the actual facts.

There have been numerous paintings of Richard of Shrewsbury being removed from his mother, a distressed looking Elizabeth Wydeville, and although for all I know Elizabeth may well have been distressed on that day,  it aint looking good for the ‘wicked uncle’ is it?

33299a0e14e0061fbcffe1d1a90dcb0d.jpg,

This version is by Philip Calderon.  Young Richard gazes tenderly at his mother   while being yanked away by his arm by a portly gentleman in red..poor little blighter.

A couple of paintings of the ‘princes’ do stand out for me.  The beautiful one by Millais (he used his daughter as a model for one of the princes) where he has the boys, standing in a darkened stairway of the Tower (where,  to add poignancy to the scene, some believe their remains were found buried) clinging to each other while a dark shadow lurks ominously at the top of the stairs…Yikes!

SRY_RHU_THC0044.jpg

The Princes in the Tower,  John Everett Millais 1878.

Another one. this time by Paul Delaroche, King Edward V and the Duke of York in the Tower,  depicts the two young boys, gazing into the middle distance, unaware, hopefully,  of their impending doom, while their spaniel’s attention, tail between his legs, is drawn to the door.  These artists certainly knew how to twang on the old heart strings!  Great stuff but  maybe not very helpful to some in forming positive perceptions of Richard’s character.

eMuseumPlus.jpeg

King Edward V and the Duke of York in the Tower, Paul Delaroche 1831.

But finally, one that is actually closer to the truth, from a mural in the Royal Exchange by the artist Sigismund Goetz, and one   I can clearly remember, as a small child, from its inclusion in Cassell’s History of the English People.  I would gaze at it, not properly understanding what it actually represented, but nevertheless entranced.  It was not until years later that I could understand what was going on and who the people were in the painting.  A grave, noble,  and rather handsome humpless Duke of Gloucester being offered the Crown at Baynards Castle.  Beautiful ladies in butterfly headdresses look down at the scene from the top of the stairs….its Cicely and Anne!.  A rather frivolous looking young man, leaning nonchalantly against the stairs,  as an elderly man, almost hidden from sight, leans over and surreptitously whispers in his ear..ah!..tis Buckingham and Morton..meanwhile in the background Gloucester supporters , in harness, roar their approval.  Splendid stuff and about time too.

M221726.jpg

Mural in the Royal Exchange,  Offer of the Kingship to Richard Duke of Gloucester at Baynards Castle June 26 1483 Sigismund Goetz

Paul Delaroche also painted The Execution of Lady Jane Grey..not one of our Ricardian characters… but a descendant of  one, Elizabeth Wydeville, via her son Thomas Grey, lst Marquess of Dorset.  Delaroche again gave his artistic license free reign..Jane was in fact executed in the open air, in the part of the Tower that is known as Tower Green where Anne Boleyn, Catherine Howard and also Margaret of Salisbury, Clarence’s daughter were executed.

330px-PAUL_DELAROCHE_-_Ejecución_de_Lady_Jane_Grey_(National_Gallery_de_Londres,_1834).jpg

The execution of Lady Jane Grey, Paul Delaroche 1833

So at least one of these extremely gifted artists managed to get it right in terms of accuracy as to what actually happened.    What gifts for the art world but for the greater part, I do wonder if in the past,  these paintings proved for some people  to be rather a hindrance for the rehabilitation of Richard’s character.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

Single Post Navigation

5 thoughts on “CAN A PICTURE PAINT A THOUSAND WORDS?

  1. viscountessw on said:

    What a pity it’s so often the “slanted” paintings that get the plaudits. Not because the artists’ skills don’t warrant it, but because those canvases lie! Yes, the illustration of Richard at Baynard’s Castle is spot-on, and maybe the boys in the Tower WERE frightened, but not because they feared Richard, rather because everything was in upheaval, their father was dead and their mother had rushed into sanctuary because she DID fear Richard. And so she should after what she’d been up to. The one of Anne and spidery Richard just plain infuriates me. It has completely lost touch with reality. I do not believe she ever, for a single moment, feared him. No woman should have feared him. He was even kind to Elizabeth Woodville and restrained toward Margaret Beaufort. With those two witches at the cauldron, there was no need for a third!

    So yes, pictures do indeed paint a thousand words….

    Liked by 3 people

  2. hoodedman1 on said:

    Pictures are indeed a strong medium. Look how in several screen portrayals the ‘Princes’ are portrayed looking just like the children in the Millais painting! Even, ahem, a certain traditionalist historian has fallen for this when describing the Princes as ‘beautiful, golden haired children.’ We have no idea if they were beautiful or golden haired. (Even with good looking parents, no guarantee, and kids often go through a really ugly phase between 10 and 14 anyway!)
    The first painting of Richard and Anne is skilful and striking but oh so very Shakespeare, implying a forced marriage. After freeing her from George (whether she was indeed in a cookshop or sequested somewhere else) Richard took Anne to sanctuary; she was not under obligation to marry him and as a dowager had more say in her own affairs than she did earlier in her life. George tried to argue at one point that Richard had ‘abducted her’ from his ‘care.’ That claim never went anywhere.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Pingback: No more chocolate-box boys in the Tower, PLEASE….! | murreyandblue

  4. Debby Wakeham on said:

    I have just bought the Sigismund Goetz picture and framed it. It looks awesom and is a pleasing antitode to all the anti-Richard caricatures and chocolate-box princely ‘victims’.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. sparkypus on said:

    Debbie where did you get it from?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: