murreyandblue

A great WordPress.com site

Richard and “Incest”- a further rebuttal

The recent suggestion by a well-known academic that Richard committed incest when he married Anne drew to my mind at least three examples at the highest levels of society where people had done something similar without any criticism.

I was confident that there were many other examples at gentry level. However, as I no longer spend my days with my nose in the pedigrees of Lancashire and Cheshire gentry families, I was not able to give chapter and verse.

However, quite by chance I have found just such an example, from Yorkshire.

“Alice de Scriven was succeeded [as Prioress of Kirklees] by Elizabeth de Staynton, daughter of John de Staynton of Woolley and his wife Joan de Wollay, by whom he had four daughters, Isabel, Elizabeth, Joan and Alice. On John de Staynton’s death his widow Joan married Hugh de Toothill near Rastrick, who, with the consent of his wife, caused Isabel and Joan to marry his two sons, and placed Elizabeth and Alice in Kirklees Priory to be brought up as nuns, so that his two sons might enjoy the whole of the Staynton estate at Woolley, which under their father’s will had been left to his daughters in equal shares.’

The period of this transaction is the 14th Century, and the source is The True History of Robin Hood by J.W. Walker, 1973 reprint, page 116. I know nothing of the author, but have no reason to think him a Ricardian, or to suppose that he invented these marriages in order to mount a future defence of Richard III against an accusation which at that time had not been made.

 

 

 

Advertisements

Single Post Navigation

3 thoughts on “Richard and “Incest”- a further rebuttal

  1. McArthur, Richard P. on said:

    I think the “academic” is Michael Hicks, who seems to have a fixation on this.

    Frankly, I suspect the “incest” angle nowadays would be the genetic relationship between Richard and Ann. I think they were second cousins.

    But, in the 15th century, the genetic dangers of inbreeding seem to have been unsuspected.

    Like

  2. sighthound6 on said:

    In the United Kingdom you are still allowed to marry your first cousin, never mind your second. Whether this is wise is another matter. As I understand it, if you both have good genes, there is no great problem. Fact is though, you can marry anyway!

    Like

  3. Iris on said:

    The same is true for Italy, I am not sure if first cousins still need a dispensation if they wish to marry with a Catholic rite, second cousins like Richard and Anne would not need any, at least nowadays.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: