The lost crown of Henry VII – yes, it was probably HIS first….
Above: The original crown. Below: The replica, shown from the same angle.
The crown shown in the picture above left is said to have originally been made for Henry VII, but ‘done up’ considerably for his spendthrift son, Henry VIII. Here is what I know of it:-
If you go to the following site, you will find an interesting article about the history of the original crown, now regarded as Henry VIII’s, and the making of a modern replica. You will also find a video about the latter crown.
Maev Kennedy wrote the article, which was published on Sunday, 7th October 2012.
The article is as follows:-
“The lost crown of Henry VIII [according to other sites, it was definitely Henry VII’s first. viscountessw] has been recreated in minute detail, down to the last pearl and thumbnail-sized enamelled sculpture, almost 400 years after the original was melted down along with every scrap of royal regalia Cromwell’s government could lay its hands on.
“The crown will be exhibited at Hampton Court Palace, where Henry [VIII] wore the original on great occasions of state and church. It will be displayed in the royal pew of the Chapel Royal, which reopens this month after seven years of restoration work.
“The crown may have been made for Henry’s father, Henry VII, and was used in the coronations of his children Edward, Mary and Elizabeth, and then of James I and Charles I. By then it was a sacred object: a portrait by Daniel Mytens in 1631 – now in the National Portrait Gallery, and crucial evidence for the historians who pored over every surviving image and account – shows Charles I standing bare-headed by a velvet-draped table, on which the crown is shown in scrupulous detail.
“In 1649 Charles was beheaded in Whitehall and the crown was broken up at the Tower of London. The gold went straight to the mint for coinage, and the jewels were sold off in mixed packets like loose sweets. Of the heap of centuries-old treasures, only one 12th-century spoon escaped the melting pot.
“Henry’s crown is first mentioned as “the kingis crowne of golde” in an inventory of his jewels in 1521. Kent Rawlinson and Aileen Peirce, historians on the staff of Historic Royal Palaces (HRP), tracked it through later inventories, including the one made after Henry’s death in 1547 when every royal cupboard was turned out to record everything from torn bedsheets to the crown and its 344 gems, including “nyne perles not all of one sorte and three Saphires”.
“The inventories showed how Henry remodelled the crown during his reign to reinforce his new role as head of the Church of England, substituting three kings for three small figures of Christ. Few in the watching crowds could have spotted that at the back of the crown, shown in the Mytens painting, he kept the tiny image of the Virgin and Child.
“The materials, costing an undisclosed five-figure sum, were paid for by HRP, and the hundreds of hours of labour, faithfully following Tudor metalworking techniques including use of hand-twisted square gold wire, were donated by Harry Collins, who retired this year as crown jeweller after completing the redisplay of the jewels in the Tower, but remains the Queen’s personal jeweller.
“The gems and pearls in the recreated crown are real, but fortunately for the HRP budget the Tudors cared more about size and colour than flawless quality. The only substitute was rock crystal for the huge diamonds and gold-plated silver instead of the original three kilos of solid gold, which would now cost considerably more than a king’s ransom.
“The recreated crown of Henry VIII goes on display at Hampton Court Palace from 27 October (2012)”
There is more about the original crown at http://members.boardhost.com/coronation/msg/1359398367.html As follows:-
“Henry VII’s crown, featuring bejewelled crosses and fleur-de-lys; with arches and a monde and cross was used right through until the Crown Jewels were destroyed by Cromwell. “Although made for Henry VII, this crown is more commonly associated with his son Henry VIII, it is first mentioned as “the kingis crowne of golde” in an inventory of his jewels in 1521; and it can be seen in later inventories, including the one made after “Henry’s death in 1547 when every royal cupboard was turned out to record everything from torn bedsheets to the crown and its 344 gems, including “nyne perles not all of one sorte and three Saphires”. “The inventories showed how Henry remodelled the crown during his reign to reinforce his new role as head of the Church of England, substituting three kings for three small figures of Christ. Few in the watching crowds could have spotted that at the back of the crown, shown in the Mytens painting, he kept the tiny image of the Virgin and Child.
“This crown was recorded in minute detail in the portrait of Charles I by Daniel Mytens in 1631.”
Right, so that’s the story as I know it. But it prompts another passing thought from me. If the original crown, as seen in the portrait of Charles I, was made for Henry VII, might jewels and so on from Richard III’s crown have been used? I realise that Henry VIII would have piled it with precious stones and glory for himself, but Richard’s crown doesn’t seem to have survived beyond Bosworth – at least, if it did, I don’t know. It would hardly have been tossed aside, nor, I imagine would it have been the crown he wore when riding into battle. So what happened to it? Was it cannibalised for Henry’s crown? That would seem an obvious thing.
I write as a layperson, of course, so if someone has the hard facts about Richard’s crown and Henry’s crown, I’d love to know.