A great site

Oh, for a wedding video!

Do you know that there are people out there who are absolutely convinced that Edward IV did not marry Eleanor Talbot? I don’t mean that they doubt the marriage, but that they know it didn’t happen. I can only think they were alive in the 15th Century and in constant attendance on Edward as this is the only way one could be certain of the facts. I really don’t know what more they need to change their minds, given that the marriage was er – secret, and that an actual Act of Parliament stated that it took place. There are a distinct shortage of marriage certificates or wedding DVDs for the period in question, so I don’t know what sort of proof they would find convincing. It would be nice if just once in a while they would admit the possibility that something might not have happened as they have decided it did.

Hastings, who practically lived in Edward’s pocket, was not immediately aware of his marriage to Elizabeth, as shown by the fact that he was giving her grief in some land dispute at the approximate time of her marriage to the king. That was how close Edward could keep a secret if he wanted to. But people in 2014 think they know that Edward couldn’t possibly have married Eleanor Talbot.

It’s apparently easier to believe was all made up by wicked Richard, a man so hard that he sprang his long-planned seizure of the throne by riding south with a massive 300 men, clearly a force easily capable of tackling the meagre Woodville escort of 2000 effete Marchers. Richard, the hardest man ever to usurp a throne, then waited for weeks before sending for reinforcements. Of course, it was all a carefully planned ploy. Presumably the northern thugs had secretly been hiding in wardrobes in Plaistow all along, just ready to spring out when required.

And then Richard had Hastings killed for no reason at all, just to show how hard he was. Of course he had a complete card index of all the English noblewomen who were unattached at the relevant time, just in case he had to invent a marriage for his brother. And Lady Eleanor’s brother and sister (still very much alive in 1483 and long afterwards) were so scared of Richard that they didn’t dare to denounce the lie even after he was dead. In fact Duchess Elizabeth (a woman apparently forced to attend Richard’s coronation at knifepoint) was so scared of his ghost that she ran off and hid in the Minories instead of telling Henry VII the truth, while Sir Humphrey Talbot was careful to go off and die abroad just in case someone asked him about Eleanor. The thought that Henry might reward them for telling the truth, or that they had some sort of duty to repair the damage to their beloved sister’s honour never seems to have crossed their minds.

Single Post Navigation

22 thoughts on “Oh, for a wedding video!

  1. Deborah K. on said:

    The people who are determined to vilify Richard could be SHOWN a wedding DVD and they still wouldn’t admit the truth. For those who believe, no proof is necessary, for those who don’t believe, no proof is possible.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Wednesday on said:

    …not to mention the terribly wronged Elizabeth Woodville never tried to defend either herself or her children when the matter of Edward IV’s bigamy came up. Never mind she was in sanctuary at Westminster Abbey, only a few feet away from both the council and Parliament when they were meeting and surrounded by ecclesiastical law experts who would have been glad to draft any defense she might put forth. She didn’t bother telling Henry Tudor that the charge was false, either, or he wouldn’t have had to reverse Titilus Regius unread, order all copies burned, and behave as if the act never existed in the first place. Things that make you go hmm….

    Liked by 1 person

  3. S Duffy on said:

    Such a shame they mislaid the medieval ‘OK’ magazine exclusive special.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. A card index? I suppose the wi-fi reception wasn’t great in that era.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Pingback: An enquiry | murreyandblue

  6. Pingback: The King’s bishop? What did John Russell know in 1483? | murreyandblue

  7. Pingback: Yet another case | murreyandblue

  8. Pingback: So who did Anne Mowbray take after….? | murreyandblue

  9. Pingback: Of course, nobody ever married in secret … | murreyandblue

  10. Pingback: People just keep marrying in secret | murreyandblue

  11. Glenis Brindley on said:

    The mind boggles!!!


  12. Pingback: Bishop Stillington’s Lost Chapel | murreyandblue

  13. Pingback: NOT AGAIN! THE LATEST FROM A CAIRO DWELLER … | murreyandblue

  14. Pingback: Another prominent Talbot | murreyandblue

  15. Pingback: The Queen of England the Tudors chose to overlook…. | murreyandblue

  16. Pingback: Three unlucky kings? | murreyandblue

  17. Pingback: Another sad dose of misinterpretation for poor old Richard III…. | murreyandblue

  18. Pingback: Ralph Boteler, Lord Sudeley, father-in-law to Lady Eleanor Talbot. | murreyandblue

  19. Pingback: Ralph Boteler, Lord Sudeley, father-in-law to Lady Eleanor Talbot. – A MEDIEVAL POTPOURRI

  20. Pingback: Elizabeth Wydeville…Serial Killer? | murreyandblue

  21. Pingback: Elizabeth Wydeville…Serial Killer? – A MEDIEVAL POTPOURRI

  22. Pingback: The Precontract that Gave Us King Richard III | murreyandblue

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: